Hotspot for torn vacation over new ‘funny’ policy for pets in aircraft booths: ‘Waste Idea’

People didn’t like the idea of ​​sitting next to a massive Air bud.

Italian air officials have caused uproar among parents for a new “funny” policy that allows medium and large -sized dogs to fly with their owners.

According to the new guidelines, approved last month by the ENAC Civil Aviation Authority, the pets whose weight exceeds 22 pounds will be allowed to travel in the cabin if the airline allows it. Previously, dogs of this size were set to fly to cargo bearing.

Italy’s new resolution to travel with pets stipulates that they must reach “approved carriers” and enter one place than in the land below. Victoriya – Stock.adobe.com

The resolution determined that pets should be placed in “approved carriers” that may even be placed in places, provided they are crashed or anchored otherwise and only if they do not prevent emergency exits or crew operations.

Enac president Pierluigi di Palma stated that the goal of politics was to secure the “well -being” of animals and make it “easier for a greater number of passengers to transport their pets with air”.

Matteo Salvini, Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Transport, expressed his support for the new rule on Instagram, writing, “Henceforth, dog and cat owners will have less difficulty flying with their four -legged friends.

As the pet mass with pets took oodles support from animal lovers, many frequent leaflets appeared less interested in the idea of ​​sharing their aerial space with plus -size pooches.

Pet carriers can be placed in the seat provided they are bent or anchored otherwise for it. New Africa – Stock.adobe.com

“Yes No … I don’t want to sit next to a dog on my flight,” arrived one day on Instagram. “I don’t even want to be covered with dog hair, and are they lifting the dog’s hair from him before the other person sitting.”

Another wrote, “Really stupid. Imagine an anxious plane, pets will all go. Seriously, what an idea of ​​waste, without security involved.”

Others emphasized that politics would be problematic for people with being phobia and allergies to wet pets. “This is really difficult for people who are afraid of dogs. I mean they are essentially blocked,” one critic observed. “The idea sounds great for dog owners, but there is also a weakness.”

“That’s funny. Don’t mind people with photobi and allergies,” complained a destroyer. “Not everyone keeps their pets as clear as they should,.”

They added, “Guess who will be sued if one dog attacks another passenger? I love dogs, but it will bite airlines and some bystanders in the boom. Yes, target jobs !!”

New policy proposals argue that pets in places are “how it should have always been”. Volha Krayeva – Stock.adobe.com

However, some fans of wool were on board with the change of order, with a support supporter, “so it should always be, the end of the story, pets are families, not just animals.”

“An airline that allows me to bring my dog ​​will have my own business for life,” another said.

In the SH.BA, size restrictions on pets are at the discretion of airlines. For example, United Airlines does not have a weight limit, but requires them to fly into a kenel that can fit under the seat in front of the owner.

However, the Department of Transport (DOT) requires airlines to allow passengers to fly with their service animals in the cabin on all US airlines.

There is no limit on the number of these dogs specialists who may be on each flight and they do not need to be transported to a content.

Some leaflets have been accused of obtaining this rule by leaving normal pets as service animals.

Last month, San Francisco Piêtra Luccas fashion influencer was justified online for her great “service” Dane in a United Airlines flight.


#Hotspot #torn #vacation #funny #policy #pets #aircraft #booths #Waste #Idea
Image Source : nypost.com

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top