Controversial advertising for a ‘beef’ fat sun has people shaking their heads: ‘For ski as healthy as a McDonald’s rash’

A photo of a billboard for a sun cream reprimanded by a brand called Prime Pure Pure has people who make a double intake.

Along with a photo of the product, the ad -reads, “SPF without tallow poison. Next to that ad, there is a photo of a blonde woman under the text reading:” The sun is not poison but your sunlight. “

Shared on X (once twitter) @peterhamby posted a photo of controversial advertising along with the text that joked, “Babes you are poisoning your face try this beef fat instead.”

And of course, when people saw this tweet – which has almost 18,000 views – jokes.

“For the skin just as healthy as the French rash of McDonald,” read a tweet.

“My big grandfather (a farmer) knocked his arms with the bacon grease, thinking he would help her keep from sunburn. No, she just made her extra fresh!” stressed another person.

“Lewis Black had little about how to use Crisco instead of the sun because it’s cheaper and ‘when you start to dive, you move your donkey,” “the same principle”, someone else attracted.

According to their site, the brand promises that its SPF products are without seed oils, fragrances, chemicals and that it is made of grass -fed length, which is technically the fat derived from the kidneys and groin of cows that eat a grass -fed diet.


The brand’s SPF is made of a grass -fed length, which is technically the fat derived from the kidneys and groin of cows that eat a grass -fed diet. Mostly pure

The company states that “Tallow is biocompatible with the skin for moisture and deeper food”.

And this is not the first time these long claims have been made.


SPF
There is a lot of confusion around the Sun of the Sun and what is safe or not. Sosiukin – Stock.adobe.com

At the end of last year, when people on social media were bringing their bodies in animal fat not only giving them glowing skin, but also to calm bites, redness and burns – the experts were skeptical of it.

“I give a finger from scientific and dermatological perspective,” the New York Times told Dr. Zakia Rahman, a Dermatology Clinical Professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

“It can potentially cause acne flames or cause irritation.”

And before you read a lot in this ad, believe that you need to throw the sunlight you are using because it is not a dermatologist certified by the effective or effective board, Dr. Sheerene Idriss, wants you to be wary of this claim.

In an Instagram coil, the expert cleans the air in this supposed myth, saying, “The danger is not what is on your sun screen, but the misinformation you are stopping you to use. Just wear the cursed sun cream.”

When she falls down her, you don’t see it.


#Controversial #advertising #beef #fat #sun #people #shaking #heads #ski #healthy #McDonalds #rash
Image Source : nypost.com

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top