Viral dog photography in public transit sparks debate: ‘People must respect public spaces’

A photo of two dogs sitting in passenger sites in a light Sydney railroad service has sparked a lit debate on the internet, with a lot of acting of the act like â € œtled.â €

The image, posted on Reddit, shows two small dogs sitting next to their owners, who are holding on their caterpillars.

â € Typical Stop with titled dog owners flying public transport rules, CT wrote the original poster.

The comments section was quickly filled with sydneysiders divided into labels and the legality of the situation.

A remark, â œgreat, now they dog ​​have their dirty knees rubbing across the places. Gross.â €

Another added: “I love dogs and have a German shepherd myself, but I would never do it and I would never want to see any other dog in the public transport chairs.”

â € œ as a myelf dog owner, this p ** me so much me. I absolutely hate it when other dog owners throw the rules, ”said one third.

Some also highlighted potential health risks.

“I am generally pro-that in any debate, but the reality is that pet allergies to pets is one of the most common allergies. You can make people sick by placing these cubs in places,” writes one user.

Others simply saw it as a fierce disrespect for shared spaces.

“I love dogs, but I wouldn’t do it. People have to respect public spaces, commented one person, while others describe this action as” € “”, œ œLueles “, and â €

Concerns for people with illness, disability or fear of dogs were also raised.

“I don’t want to get my customers with disabilities and/or immunocompromis in public transport for something that happens to them,” write one woman.

â € œit € ™ is avoidable, it is dumb.â €

However, some supported the idea of ​​dogs in public transport, arguing that Sydney remains behind other global cities, especially throughout Europe and America, where dogs are usually allowed.

“In Europe, dogs are everywhere: trains, restaurants, etc., said one commenter.

â € œTo many rules in this country, added € € €.

“For such an external city, it’s crazy about how snobs and institutions about dogs are,” a third wrote.

Others argued that strict public transport rules do not harm pet owners who do not have a car.

With 40 percent of Sydney families who own one or more dogs, the city has one of the highest levels of dog ownership worldwide.

Others emphasized that they have seen worse behaviors from people in public transport.

â € œIâ € ™ I have seen human people who were worse in the countries. I’m not for him, but people disgust me more than dogs, to be honest, “one said.

â € œ if we have only limited some of the other animals allowed in public transport, € jokingly.

According to NSW, only valid accreditation animals are allowed throughout public transport in the New South Wales.

For other pets, including dogs, regulations are a lot of strike.

Pets can be allowed to travel on buses, ferries, light rail and taxi if bordered to a box, basket or other content, but are not allowed at the metric and trains at all.

The permit is still required by staff or driver, who may refuse the animal if the service is reaching capacity, or if the animal looks unclean, evil or likely to disturb, threaten or annoy other customers.

According to the (General) 2017 passenger transport regulation, the fine for violating these rules is $ 550.