A federal judge on Wednesday opposed the arguments made by an artificial intelligence company that its chatbots are protected from the first change – at least for now. A teenage boy to kill himself.
The judge will order that the method of death of death continue to continue, in what legal experts are among the latest constitutional tests of artificial intelligence.
Success was presented by a mother from Florida, Megan Garcia, who claims her 14-year-old son Setzer III fell victim to a character.
Metali Jain of the Technical Justice Law Project, one of the Atttorne for Garcia, said the judge’s order sends a message that Silicon Valley â € œNeeds to stop and think and impose guard before starting products in the market.
The lawsuit against the character technologies, the company behind the character. It also appoints individual developers and Google as defendants. It has attracted the attention of legal experts and observers in the US and beyond, as technology rapidly reformulates jobs, market places and relationships, despite what experts warn are potentially existential risks.
“The order certainly defines it as a possible case of evidence on some broader issues that include it,” Thana Barnett Lidsky, a law professor at the University of Florida focus on first change and artificial intelligence.
The lawsuit claims that in the last months of his life, Setzer was increasingly isolated from reality as he engaged in sexualized conversations with the bot, who was modeled after an imaginary character from the television show – œgame of Thrones. The moments after receiving the message, Setzer shot himself, according to legal registrations.
In one state, a character spokesman. He showed a number of security features that the company has implemented, including children’s guards and sources in the prevention of suicides that were announced on the day the lawsuit was filed.
“We care deeply about the safety of our users and our goal is to offer a space that is attractive and secure,” the statement said.
Lawyers for developers want the case to be dismissed because they say chatbots deserve protection of the first change, and the ruling may otherwise have an effect of separation “on the industry of it.
In her Wednesday’s order, US District Judge Anne Conway rejected some of the claims of the defendants’ free speech, saying she “s”
Conway revealed that characters’ technologies can claim the first rights to change her users, whom she found to be entitled to “” she also determined that Garcia can move forward with claims that Google can be helped by her alleged role in helping development character. Some of the founders of the platform had previously worked on building it on Google, and success says the technology that was “for the dangers” of technology.
“We do not strongly agree with this decision,” said Google spokesman Josã © Castaá ± Eda. “
Despite how the lawsuit plays, Lidsky says the issue is a warning of “the risks of our emotional and mental health to AI.â €
â € œitâ € ™ warning to parents that social media and generating equipment are not always harmless, ”she said.
#judge #opposes #arguments #chatbots #free #speech #rights #lawsuits #death #adolescents
Image Source : nypost.com